Let it be assumed as an axiom that art is itself a saying of the void, the site of subtraction which reveals the state as only part of the being-multiple and never, in any sense, the whole of multiplicity. We ought not, however, to think art as in any way a wholeness in itself, lest it cease to be art–the suture in the state–and become the state itself. Art expresses the real of the being-multiple–the void–by whatever figurative means are available to it.
Art is a subtraction, it is an eruption of the void into the state situation. But the situation it disrupts is that which we commonly call “culture.” Culture, the supposed sum and total of human existence, the discursive field within and upon and through which the state exists and which insists upon its own summative nature. Art disrupts culture.
We are now at a moment in history–and here I mean not the linear history of the West, but rather the cyclical history of the seasons, of the calendar, and of the liturgy–which is undoubtedly embedded in culture. We must think “Christmas” not as event, but as part of the state, a situation which rests upon the void and which awaits the marking of the evental site(site evenement) in order to become art.
The event of the holiday, then, is that which exposes and names the void, and it is not to be found in our constant self-assurances of abundance and overflow. The void is not in the shopping malls. It is not to be found in the economico-cultural beacon of the times: the Christmas special, with its platitudes and easy answers. These deny the void. They insist on its nonexistence. All is abundance. All is plenitude. Mr. Van Pelt’s declaration–“That is what Christmas is all about”–limits the situation while omitting to state its own stating of that limit. Van Pelt’s Christmas is local, as is the Christmas “miracle” of so many entertainments. It is cultural, and has nothing to say about truth–the saying of the void.
Only in the kitchen does the happening of truth, the beginning of the truth-procedure occur. Here, the cook–a parent or grand-parent (père)—seizes the bird which will be the sign of local plenitude for the Christmas feast, and marks it as void, sweeping out the innards and guts (entrailles) in order to fill it once more with stuffing. The bird is rendered empty: its fullness itself becoming the very articulation of its emptiness. From this site will proceed the truth in all its true universality in its declarations–“This is delicious,” “I’m stuffed,” “I need a nap,”–and in the beings-faithful which follow these declarations: satiation, sleep. Here, the declaration of fullness is itself the articulation of the void of the holiday: I am full now, not yesterday. Christmas thus is not, but rather becomes in the truth procedure of the dinner, where the diners insist on their being fulfilled now, and not in the local cultures of the Van Pelts and Geisels of the world.
Read Full Post »